How much money did pharrell make off of blurred lines

how much money did pharrell make off of blurred lines

Williams and Thicke were found liable for copyright infringement by a federal jury in Marchand Gaye was awarded posthumous songwriting credit based on the royalties pledged to his estate. The song’s music video was released in two versions: one featuring models Emily RatajkowskiJessi M’Bengue, and Elle Evans topless, while the other censored the nudity. The uncensored version of the video was removed from YouTube for violating the site’s terms of servicebut restored with an age restriction. As of Januarythere is no age restriction on the uncensored music video. The lyrics and music video to «Blurred Lines» were controversial, with some groups claiming they are misogynistic and promote a culture of date rape. It was banned in the United Kingdom from some institutions and students’ unions at universities. Thicke offered numerous rebuttals, but also called the song «a bad joke». Williams defended his song, saying the accusers were selectively picking apart the lyrics and the song was actually meant to empower women although Williams came to later regret working on the song. It became Thicke’s first, T. It became one of the best-selling singles of all timewith sales of The song was completed in less than an hour.

More top stories

File photograph from of Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams performing. In August , following an accusation by the Gaye family that the song borrowed from Got to Give It Up, Thicke and Williams filed a lawsuit to try and affirm that their song did not infringe copyright. Earlier this year, a judge upheld the original ruling, resulting in this new amended judgment. The sum was later reduced, but the pair still appealed the ruling in More from The Irish Times Music. Sponsored Ireland at the epicentre of the aviation finance industry. Banish the January blues by booking a luxury holiday. Minding the gender pay gap — much more than a compliance issue. Subscriber Only. This Mournable Body: The horror of simply being alive.

Thank you!

Understanding the hidden history of Myanmar. Threshold: a magical mystery tour of mind expansion. Electric Picnic All our coverage of the best music and arts festival of the year. Album Reviews. Kiwi Jr. Neneh Cherry: Raw Like Sushi. Halsey: Manic. Varo: Varo.

Musicians must give the money to Marvin Gaye’s family over similarity between songs

.

$7.3 Million Judgment Is Two-Thirds of Thicke and Pharrell’s Earnings From “Blurred Lines”

Perfect for the invisible man! It’s not the same chord progression. Couple will rake in cash from Diana’s inheritance and mega-million-dollar deals with Netflix and Apple Australian academic details what life is like behind bars in the hellhole Tehran prison in a series of Regardless of who actually wrote «Blurred Lines» or if it plagiarized Marvin Gaye, the lawsuit has revealed some very interesting information about the song’s profits. This is not a drill! If so, you may understand why Marvin’s children, Frankie and Nona Gaye, might be a little upset. Login Subscribe. Harry begins his life away from the Firm: Prince arrives in Canada to join Meghan and baby Archie — as Eating green bananas, climbing stairs on tiptoes, and brushing your teeth: 20 brilliant tricks guaranteed to Gallien testified that the lifespan of a record is typically 18 months, when it comes to «working it in the marketplace. My 45 years hooked on gambling: England’s legendary goalkeeper Peter Shilton reveals he blew thousands of Wilbur, who played many parts of each song on a keyboard for the court, went into great detail with her musical analysis.


$7.3 Million Judgment Is Two-Thirds of Thicke and Pharrell’s Earnings From “Blurred Lines”

As you probably recall, «Blurred Lines» was the biggest hit of The song was practically unavoidable for six months. It sold five million copies in 22 weeks, six million copies in 29 weeks, and a total of 7. It has sold It’s the fastest selling song in digital history and the second best selling digital single of all time, right behind «I Gotta Feeling» by The Black Eyed Peas. Suffice it to say, «Blurred Lines» was an absolute musical phenomenon that, unsurprisingly, put A LOT of money in the pockets of the song’s creators, Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams.

There’s just one problem. And thanks to legal paperwork that was filed this week, we’re learning some intimate financial details that would normally be kept top secret by the music industry. Before we go any further, take a listen to this youtube video. Can you hear the similarities? If so, you may understand why Marvin’s children, Frankie and Nona Gaye, might be a little upset. In AugustMr. Thicke filed a preemptive lawsuit against the Gaye family after hearing rumblings that they were about to file a lawsuit of their own against him for copyright infringement.

One major problem for Mr. Thicke is that way before any lawsuits were filed, he told a number of media outlets that he and Pharrell set out to make a song exactly like «Gotta to Give It Up. Ignoring the lawsuit for a second, if you believe this version of the story, you can understand why Robin would be entitled to a large chunk of the writing credit for BL. It sounds like he was sitting side by side with Pharrell suggesting chords, jotting down chords, imagining riffs.

In reality, he actually didn’t do anything to help write or create BL. According to his testimony:. I felt it was a little white lie that didn’t hurt his [Pharrell’s] career, but boosted mine… This is what happens every day in our industry… I was high on Vicodin and alcohol when I showed up at the studio… Pharrell had the beat and he wrote almost every single part of the song. Williams maintains that the two songs are «completely different. One’s minor and one’s major. And not even in the same key.

It’s not the same chord progression. It’s a feeling. Because there’s a cowbell in it and a Fender Rhodes as the main instrumentation — that still doesn’t make it plagiarized. We all know it’s derivative.

That’s how Pharrell works. Everything that Pharrell produces is derivative of another song — but it’s a homage. Regardless of who actually wrote «Blurred Lines» or if it plagiarized Marvin Gaye, the lawsuit has revealed some very interesting information about the song’s profits. This information is especially interesting because we almost never get to learn this kind of precise financial detail related to the music industry. That’s more than any other song of Let’s take a second to recognize how big of a scumbag move it was for Robin to steal credit from Pharrell.

This is the same thing that happened with Puff Daddy and Sting. So what do you think? Does Marvin Gaye’s family deserve millions? Celebrity Net Worth. Search Random. Share on Facebook. Did we make a mistake?

Read More From TIME

Representing the «Blurred Lines» songwriters, attorney Howard King wryly pointed out that, given that the sheet music and not its commercial sound recording for «Got to Give It Up» is central to this trial, it was interesting that Stern found no similarities between both songs’ crowd noise, hi-hats, or falsettos, all of which were not in the sheet music. Before the Gaye parties wrapped up their case Tuesday morning, they called several other witnesses to the stand. One issue that has been raised in the trial is whether overhead costs should be added to the sum, which the Gayes favor.

Read More From TIME

Gallien testified that the lifespan of a record is typically 18 months, when it comes to «working it in the marketplace. While last week, the Gayes’ music expert, Judith Finell, had testified that the songs bore substantial blured, the «Blurred Lines» parties’ music expert, Sandy Wilbur, testified Tuesday that she did not find the songs to be «meaningfully similar. She pointed out that the structure of «Blurred Lines» — intro, verse, pre-chorus, chorus, verse, pre-chorus, chorus, rap, verse, chorus was a «very, very common format for a song. I’s rap, saying it was equally common for a song to have a «break or rap,» which is often used to put something different into a song, providing it with a unique twist apart from its prominent melodies. Wilbur, who played many parts of each song on a keyboard for the court, went into great detail with her musical analysis. Thicke and Phaerell were absent from dld for the second day in a row, on day four at the trial, which is taking place in a federal courtroom in downtown Los Angeles. The Maie parties are expected to wrap up their case that same day, while both sides are expected to present closing arguments Thursday, when the jury instructions will be delivered. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person’s head and shoulders. It often indicates a user profile. Login Subscribe. My Account. World globe An icon of the world globe, indicating different international options. Pamela ChelinHow much money did pharrell make off of blurred lines Wrap.

Comments